This landscape photography shootout sees 24mm and 200mm lenses clash


We often see lenses described as being for a particular type of photography. Anything in the 50-135mm range is for portraits, anything 150+ is for wildlife or sports, and anything 28mm or less is generally considered a “lens. landscape ”. Wide angle lenses generally seem to be designated for this genre.

All of this makes no sense, of course you can shoot whatever you want with whatever focal length you choose. And that is put to the test in this landscape photography challenge between landscape photographers Nigel Danson and James Popsys. One is only allowed to shoot with a 24mm while the other must shoot with 200mm.

At the start of the challenge, neither of them knew which lens they were going to shoot, although they both knew what they wanted to shoot. James wanted the 24mm and Nigel wanted the 200mm. This was decided on the flip side of a lens cap, due to the great UK coin shortage (for real who carries cash these days?) And they all have both got lucky and got the goals they wanted.

It’s interesting to hear them talk about their different approaches as they shoot with the two very different focal lengths and what they are looking for in the scene, how they compose and where they want to direct the viewer’s gaze. If you’re a landscape photographer who’s only ever shot one way, it’s worth having a watch.

It’s pretty rare that I use long focal lengths for landscapes myself – unless it’s something that I plan to take a bunch of images and stitch them together in post-production – generally preferring to go wide enough. . It might be the boring and obvious choice for landscapes, but whenever I’ve found myself ‘stuck’ with just a long focal length lens and forced myself to look for compositions, I’ve always enjoyed them. results that I managed to get.

Maybe I should start photographing longer focal length landscapes! Do you shoot landscapes with a long lens or do you prefer the wide angle?


Comments are closed.